Exh alltroitro

I believe that in a perfect world we would force all men on Earth (or at least in North America) to live underground and to use them solely for breeding purposes, while women live above ground and have 100 percent freedom and control of society in a full Matriarchy. But sadly there is no way to implement that and doing so would break every rule in the Little Black book of Libertarianism. But I can dream can't I?

I agree with this article on how marriage via patriarchy has dehumanized and oppressed women by coercing or forcing them to be housewives and child rearers in subordination to their husbands while their husband is the breadwinner and Alpha. Women should destroy such oppressing gender roles and to do so by us destroying patriarchy. 

As a Marxist Feminist I focus upon the  interconnectivity of the  patriarchy and capitalism.

I put more focus on the role of capitalism in the oppression of women (which commodifies women via patriarchal marriages)

Due to my Socialistic/Marxian Feminism I want a two-pronged theory to broaden Marxist feminism's argument for the role of capitalism in the oppression of women and radical feminist theory of the role of gender and the patriarchy. We have to abolish Capitalism and move to a Post Capitalist world and

I am wary of radical feminism's main claim that patriarchy is the only, or primary, source of oppression of women. Instead, I assert that women are oppressed due to their financial dependence on males which is economic patriarchy (or sexist wage slavery of women being wage slaves to their husbands)

Here is why I am against marriages, since marriages are hierarchical by nature no matter how much superficial changes are made to pretend the marriages are equal. At the very least we should promote free love private/non official matrimonial egalitarian connections between men and women as a left wing alternative to marriages

This is due to men using and abusing marriages to make women sub ordinate to them and to dehumanize women to be the child rearers while men work outside the home providing for the family. (but I am in agreement with Horace Greeley that the purpose of having children is to raise up pure, virtuous, and modest sons and daughters to the State. As seen with Russia it is important for a country until we abolish it to promote men and women having children to the state [while upholding parental rights of course])

I support free love including the type promoted in the 19th century by Kansas free-love activists Lillian Harman and Edwin Walker who viewed marriage “wholly private compact” of no concern to anybody by themselves, while they conducted their own marriage ceremony without involving either State or clergy.

I support Lillian Harman rightfully declining the sexist patriarchal vow obedience to her husband (since Harman is thankfully both a feminist and libertarian anarchist) 

I support Lillian Harman rightfully declining to submerge her individuality in another’s by taking her husband’s last name: “I retain, also, my full maiden name, as I am sure it is my duty to do.” Walker for his part vowed that “Lillian is and will continue to be as free to repulse any and all advances of mine as she has been heretofore. In joining with me in this love and labor union, she has not alienated a single natural right. She remains sovereign of herself, as I of myself, and we … repudiate all powers legally conferred upon husbands and wives.” In particular he repudiated any right as husband to control his wife’s property; he also acknowledged his “responsibility to her as regards the care of offspring, if any, and her paramount right to the custody t..

So all relationships between men and women should be as egalitarian/equitable, NON hierchal, free love ridden as the 19th century relationship between Lillian Harman and Edwin Walker. This is another reason I support Feminism and Libertarian Anarchism so women will have these Lillian Harman-Edwin Walker types of relationships with men as opposed to the hierarchical, sexist, male supremacist marriages (i.e traditional opposite sex marriage) where husbands dehumanize their wives by making them kitchen slaves and their baby makers (not my words their words)

This exert exposes how power is sexy and how that sexiness in our society upholds patriarchy and male power over women.

I support Men’s Liberation/MensLib (though I feel that Mens rights are counter-revolutionary, men are not oppressed in regards due to their gender except as noted below and in the screenshot meme section).

I generally believe that Male Patriarchy/Patriarchy is at least somewhat culturally pervasive (to put it mildly, understatement of the century) and it has a negative effect on everyone, and negatively effects women more than men. Gender stereotypes harm BOTH men and women.

We need more civil liberties and gender equality. The patriarchy is still unfortunately a factor and has claimed many victims (mostly women). Gender roles suck. We must defeat the patriarchy 

The patriarchy might (big might) be enforced by women too (at least slightly see below) so the concept of a male patriarchy/patriarchy is not as simple as a oppressor-oppressed dynamic.

Patriarchy misses the point that there is equal vulnerability of average men and that our Patriarchal system excludes men who don’t conform to traditional gender roles. 

As much as I am no fan of intersectionality, it has its uses in this area. Complicating the patriarchy idea is that Transgender men and gay men are more likely to defy the gendered patriarchal expectations which sadly harm them for daring to be different in this boring vanilla world, which gives them unique outlooks on this.

Anyway, ‘manliness’ shouldn’t be defined by the traditional archaic perceptions of that term . Men should be able to act how they want whether traditionally masculine or other ways that aren’t traditionally masculine (like femboys) 

That does not mean men can’t still be proud of their masculinity despite defying gender role norms . I hate society telling people how they are supposed to act, whether its gender roles, what type of clothes to wear (why can’t I wear unmatching clothes or white after Labor Day?), and similar things. Men can also lift to better themselves instead of for the sexist degrading reason of impressing women (which is so archaic)

Patriarchy/Male Patriarchy is sadly very real and infests our culture and institutions. We have to stop women from being oppressed by defeating the Patriarchy/Male Patriarchy so we can defeat sexism. Men also have issues because of this evil patriarchal system and intersectionality along with other feminist concepts are needed to combat this

Feminism should be inclusive to everyone like body positive, body negative feminist movements are like so

I disagree with feminism on dating and relationship struggles. Contrary to what feminists claim, those issues are not due to not respecting boundaries or lack of self confidence. 

Those issues are because dating involves a lot of work for men including men having to make guesses on when to make their move. 

This can be tiring and not really fair to men. Also feminists don’t realize that men are offended and hurt by the fact that many women are shallow when choosing a man, using arbitrary and shallow things like fashion, career status, social status, body fitness, wealth. 

Moreover feminists don’t realize how sad and archaic it is for some women to choose traditionally masculine men.

Women are unfortunately not willing to let men have their emotional guard down and feminists insensitively claim men should stay away from such women while also countering this view by men in addition to saying no one is ‘entitled’ to a relationship. 

It is true that men can’t/SHOULD NOT force someone to love another person, but the feminists mentioned above are not helpful in this at all, and they underscore how it is perfectly normal to want a relationship over involuntary relationship loneliness which our society should try to prevent. They are however correct that forcing someone into a relationship is wrong 

We need to expose the patriarchal injustices in society and fix them by abolishing the patriarchy . Both men and women should be free

Men’s Liberation can also be used to give cisgender HSTS Homosexual male kids and teens who transition to straight Transsexual/Transgender women, more options and flexibility (like staying as cisgender males instead of automatically needing to become Transgender women)

Here is a blog post where I give my views on topic similar to Men’s Liberation

Sometimes I get a tingling to dial down the feminism on my end. It makes me feel guilty about my kinks, and I perceive it to be difficult to develop relationships with other men because men are trash and I perceive it to be difficult to develop relationships with women. 

The reason for this is I can't stop thinking about the ways that I might be involuntarily extracting resources from women and I do much emotional labor for them yet I always feel guilty when women try to do the same thing for me.

I echo the various flavors of sentiments expressed in this menslib reddit thread about a Texas ruling on military drafts in relation to sexes/genders 

As a Mens Lib I count Conservative Feminism as a Frenemy and here is what I have to say to Conservative Feminists:

•  Conservative Feminism - Alright then. If you want to remain a tradwife, suit yourself, but why won't you recognize  transgender men as men and  transgender women as women? But at least you're not some men-hating misandrist like   them.

I am fine with Female Masculinity

Women can be hateful toward men. I don't care if its with or without 'societal backing' or 'power', anti male hatred is wrong just like Misgony and Sexism are wrong. I similarly don’t believe that institutional misandry exists

There is nothing wrong with men showing chivalry to women or women showing chivalry to men or men showing chivalry to men. Chivalry is not sexist. Chivalry is a good thing and men should show chivalry to women. 

This is an internal conflict I have however if I read some other menslib guy posting what I wrote above I would probably criticize him for it. 

I am against chauvinism in all forms, including Male Chauvinism.

The best way for women to deal with Male Chauvinist pigs is to kick the **** out of those Male Chauvinists in a unsanctioned MMA type fight or to OWN those Male Chavuinists at sports like Billie Jean King did to Bobby Riggs in 1971.

I am against domestic violence . Domestic violence is evil and must be stamped out forever

Men who commit domestic violence are abusive toward women are not real men but cowards and losers

Men should do what this article by Teen Vogue says to do

I will always come to the rescue of women victims or men victims of domestic violence to help protect them from domestic violence

I believe that women should beat the **** out of their husbands if their husbands abuse/hurt them or even try to abuse/hurt them. The most direct way for women to stop domestic violence and abuse is to literally fight back and kick the **** out of their husbands to teach them not to **** with them.

I am against marital Rape. Rape is a serious and horrible crime whether committed against a spouse or a stranger. Unlike non marital rape where it is usually a one off thing and extremely traumatizing, marital rape happens between partners who know each other and could be a recurring thing which makes it even worse for the victim if that is possible. Marital rape is a betrayal and goes against the values of marriage

I believe women shouldn't get as much penalties for domestic violence as men. Domestic violence penalties for men on women domestic abuse should be tough as it is now. 

But women don't have the power men have in society, and holding them to the same standards of domestic violence as men, would make it harder for women to defend themselves against their abusive husbands (since they'd think they would get in trouble for fighting back)

I believe that energy spent on ejaculating is better spent going out, meeting women, getting married, and starting a family

Blaming women fighting against misogyny, holding men accountable for the first time in history for the rise of ongoing vicious misogyny, sex trafficking and the loss of human rights is futile, wrong and backfires. Because doing blaming for fighting against that stuff, is obviously not going to show the feminist that they were wrong  

I support this Lefty Gender equality ideology